Lovly In IE & Not FF..!

[Smoky]

Hey....

Check this page out in IE then in FF:

ARL (http://www.fightinglimits.co.uk/arl2/)

Why doesnt any of the headers come up?

Thanks for any help

[mahangee]

I believe that they dont come up because of the URL that you are using to get them from. Rename your folder to "menu_images" instead of "menu images". It is far better to use an underscore rather than a space in folder names. :D Should solve it.

Have Fun :D
mahangee

[Smoky]

Good thinking Bat Man, but to my disbelieve it didnt work... Could it be something with having the full path of the image instead of a short hand path? Or is something wrong with my CSS?

[Gem]

question....why have your keywords 1px hidden and left aligned?

hidden and 1px is against internet protocol. ..left aligned is OK. :)

why not just put your keywords into a visible keyword rich paragraph at the bottom of the page?

G


BTW...your page is way too wide for my 1064px screen...as for 800x600 user...who knows?

[Smoky]

I cant see what is wrong with hiding keywords.. I think its a great idea.

Also i am designing this web site for a client. The web site is designed on a 1280 by 1024 resolution & if the client wants to pay extra for it to fit all resolutions he can. But until he wants a auto sizer on his page it dont matter to me. :blink:

To view what a auto sizer does visit:
Langstone (http://smoky.hostmatrix.org/test/)

That web site was also designed on a 1280 by 1024 resolution. Also why do you have such a weird resolution..? :huh:

To anyone else reading this who has problems with there CSS...

The problem with the coding was mainly the z-index. FF doesnt like the z-index being a minus number. Also add # to every hexidecial number.

[Gem]

<<Also why do you have such a weird resolution..?>>

it always grows by 40px at 3.45AM :)...or it may have been a typo :)

not sure your client would appreciate hidden text..but thats your decision to make..not mine.
regards GEM

[Smoky]

Originally posted by Gem@Jan 7 2005, 07:45 PM
<<Also why do you have such a weird resolution..?>>

it always grows by 40px at 3.45AM :)...or it may have been a typo :)

not sure your client would appreciate hidden text..but thats your decision to make..not mine.
regards GEM
22080


Emm the hidden text is more for google. Its because google searches the pages for the words. It doesnt use the Meta Tags. Thats why i hide the words at the bottom of the page.

[chilipie]

Originally posted by Smoky@Jan 8 2005, 11:07 AM
Emm the hidden text is more for google. Its because google searches the pages for the words. It doesnt use the Meta Tags. Thats why i hide the words at the bottom of the page.
22179

Google does use meta tags; hiding words in your page may mean that Google blacklists your site, and removes it from its listings.

[Gem]

Originally posted by chilipie@Jan 8 2005, 03:18 PM
Google does use meta tags; hiding words in your page may mean that Google blacklists your site, and removes it from its listings.
22186


actually you are both right...google does read meta's...so you can for example tell it NOT to cache a page...but it does not read Keyword Meta's, but you should still have them for the other SE's. Still no excuse for hidden text....its against googles TOS, read it and see. So you would have to tell your clients that you are breaking the rules and they might get banned from google.....now thats a conversation i would love to be there for !!
Instead of having it hidden...just make it bigger and visible...and preferably part of a paragraph or sentence. Easy. Simple..and standard practice.

[Smoky]

That sucks that its in the Tos... Grrrrr... Why do people have to abuse things on the internet.

I believe the only thing google reads in the Meta tag section is the robots tag. & i know i should have Meta tags in there but i have got around that yet. Iv just got all the code validated by W3C which is cool.

Any ways im gonna make some changes...

What does google allow you to do in the fact of extending keywords?